Siffi ROI Calculator

Estimate the return on investment of Siffi’s employee wellbeing services

EUR
EUR
Auto-calculated from employee count. You may edit this value.

Results

Net Benefit (EUR / year)
ROI
ROI Ratio
Payback Period (months)
Presenteeism (EUR / year)
Absenteeism (EUR / year)
Turnover (EUR / year)
Total Value Saved (EUR / year)
Siffi Cost (EUR / year)
Presenteeism Days Saved
Absenteeism Days Saved

Siffi vs Traditional EAP

Same model, different annual utilization (20 % vs 4.9 %) and cost structure

Siffi
Annual utilization 20.0 %
Annual cost
Total value saved
Net benefit
ROI
Payback
Traditional EAP
Annual utilization 4.9 %
Annual cost
Total value saved
Net benefit
ROI
Payback
Siffi additional net benefit vs Traditional EAP

Annual utilization

Annual utilization (Siffi)20.0 %
Annual utilization (Traditional EAP)4.9 %

Siffi pricing

Base counselling (% of total employees)30.0 %
Base counselling price5 € / month
Premium (% of total employees)5.0 %
Premium price70 € / month
Total cost per employee per year60 €

Productivity model

Productivity multiplier1.3 ×
Work days / month20
Confounder adjustment (Richmond 2015)−23 %

Presenteeism (90-day episode)

Baseline capacity lost12.3 %
Reduction post-EAP23.0 %

Absenteeism (90-day episode)

Incremental absent days / user6.0 days
Reduction post-EAP57.0 %

Turnover

At-risk turnover rate (annual)10.0 %
Reduction post-EAP10.0 %
Replacement cost multiplier6.0 × monthly salary

Traditional EAP comparison

Annual utilization rate4.9 %
EAP cost per employee / year50 €

Sources

Attridge, Cahill, Granberry & Herlihy 2013 · Riedel et al. 2009 · Stewart et al. 2003 · Richmond et al. 2015 · WOS Annual Report 2021 (Attridge / LifeWorks) · Nicholson 2006 · Pauly 2008 · SHRM / Agovino 2019 · Wagner 2016 · Deloitte 2022.

Breakdown

This estimate is based on model assumptions and input data. Productivity savings are after a 23 % Richmond 2015 confounder adjustment for non-EAP-attributable improvement.